Top latest Five latest pakistani case law Urban news

33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives in the police would be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, make certain legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair to the offender and also the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

The main objectives of police is always to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and previously mentioned all make sure regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more

fourteen. While in the light with the position explained over, it's concluded that a civil servant contains a fundamental right being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be thought of for no fault of his individual and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency from the duration of service or from the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release like a legally identified conviction. Read more

thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is founded and the employee is found guilty after thanks process of regulation, it's the prerogative in the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the various penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is just not proportionate with the seriousness with the act of misconduct will not be ample even so the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion within a structured and lawful fashion. Read more

Many of the volumes (which include more recent volumes than the library's holdings) can also be readily available online through the Caselaw Access Project.

When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, even though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it really is actually rather vague about whether the ninety-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based about the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held towards the 90-working day notice need, and rules in Stacy’s favor.

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the regulation when it is actually unclear the way it relates to any given situation, typically rendering judgments based on the intent of lawmakers as well as circumstances with the case at hand. These decisions become a guide for future similar cases.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It's also a nicely-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent check here findings on the evidence.

This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may interfere with the summary or the finding and mildew the relief to make it suitable to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or even the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified because of the decision on the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of your respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section 20 on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.

Problems or Errors Should you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a bad link or maybe a portion of the opinion missing), please notify the eService Middle.

Previous four tax years interpreted. It is not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

The learned Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced through the findings during the Impugned order, after recording of evidence from the respective parties. Read more